Is America a country that is in a constant state of flux as it is in a Essay

Is the States a field that is in a constant defer of flux as it is in a constant state of flux as it relates to identity or is it - Essay ExampleTherefore, it is solitary(prenominal) appropriate that debate regarding the quotation of the nation, one which is shaped by political convictions and cultural factors should be pushed towards a decisive conclusion. It is only by the resolution of much(prenominal) debate can there be a better appreciation of interior(a) and social traits be achieved, which would consequently lead to solutions for other problems in society. In presenting the arguments involved in the tell debates, two articles may help. These are Who and What is American the Things We Continue to Hold in Common by Lewis Lapham and Dinosaur Dreams construe the Bones of Americas Psychic Mascot by Jack Hitt. Both articles are attempts at understanding the American psyche, especially in relation to identity. Laphams article is more direct in presenting his arguments that Americans have the tendency to constantly make changes in there perspectives, stand, or tastes, many aspects, from the most grave to the most trivial. On the other hand, Hitt insists that Americans are to use old symbols in order to represent their resilience and their proclivity to stabilize everything. Although both may have differences, it is obvious though these articles ultimately reach an contract that the American mode of thinking is actually open to changes. Therefore, it is clear that the country itself cannot avoid being a state of flux always. Just like all other societies in different parts of the globe, America continues to evolve. Naturally, this means that changes are still occurring in whatever aspect, whether it is political, cultural, and economic. Even if the country is actually centuries old, its development never ceases because of the simple fact that its people are never well-provided about what they already have. This is not a bad thing though. In fact, th e reason why innovations are made, ones that improve industry, make lifestyles more convenient, and cultures more advance is that Americans are always trying to discover something new. As American society continues to evolve, it can only be in a state of flux, largely triggered by its response to challenges of existing situations. One inference of this continuous instability is in the field of politics. It is quite clear that a huge majority of Americans voted for hot seat Obama in the 2008 elections. However, now that he is in power, it did not take long for many to shift sides in politics. Lapham formulates that democratic politics trades in only two markets the market in expectation and the market in blame. (January 1992) This means that when Americans feel that their expectations are not met, they automatically lay the blame on the on the individual which they previously believed could solve problems of society. Because of this attitude, there will always be the impression that Americans are rarely contented with what they have hence, the inclination towards flux. There is, however, a counter-argument to Laphams theory. This articulated by Hitt as he tries to explain the Americans penchant for dinosaur, particularly the T-rex. Hitt points out that they tend to hold on to old symbols or extinct objects such as the dinosaur. He explains that the dinosaurs periodic rebirth in pop culture neatly signals loggerheaded tectonic shifts in our sense of ourself as a country.